The Brooklyn New York Times Out Loud, hosted by Jonny Gowanus
Injustice In and your Expect justice Out?
-
Categories
-
Tags
-
Archives
-
RSS Feeds
-
Meta
The Brooklyn New York Times Out Loud, hosted by Jonny Gowanus
Injustice In and your Expect justice Out?
Often asked in the dark, Americans wonder if the immigration waves we all know are on the way, absent protective legislation, will come from South Americans or The Chinese. When asked about preference, to an American, all choose South Americans. After all, they are Americans, albeit not us. With the similar culture and religions it seems the natural choice. But are the South Americans holding up their end of the bargain? The American system, our cultural system, is built on assimilation. Failure to assimilate is a failure to join the American character. These folk might help form the American character, but without assimilation, the individuals cannot be American characters. So what’s the problem? I’ll tell you, the problem is that by default, The Chinese will become our character, unless, ours is stronger than theirs. As it stands now, the American character can be put against any in the world and come out on top. The Chinese problem is that they have the numbers. With those numbers and the fact that they assimilate really well,the likelihood, the probability, the chances are best that America will not be overwhelmed by the people we choose, but instead by the people who work our system better. The question then becomes, is The American Character rugged enough to withstand the unstoppable, ongoing and long-term infiltration by The Chinese? When that infiltration comes, and it will come, will the American Character be rugged enough to remain in the face of “the new option?”, or, will we fall prey to easy wives, worker-bee swarms and guys that want us near, that is, until they don’t. To look properly at this, one must delve deep into the world of artists, progressives (not the political kind, but the do it my own way kind) and how our leaders treat these people. As of this second, we, and our leaders, treat these people as misfits, miscreants, problems, radicals, corrupters and an obstacle to a more efficient America worker-bee. I am happy to report that like The East Village, Brooklyn supports characters. Does your hood? Tell me, who is you character and how have you treated him or her lately – either in terms of in person contact, or the way yo talk about them or allow others to talk about them?
The Brooklyn New York Times Out Loud with Jonny Gowanus provides a unique mix of Argument and Literature. The argument stems from current events, as well as those political legal, philosophical and religious topics your momma told you to steer clear of at cocktail parties. The literature is original poetry, stories, drama, music and moving pictures.
Death be not proud,
Death be a shroud.
It will come with certainty,
It will come sleepily,
If you are one cast of vision
Distinguishing the view from prison.
Life gives time
To consider earnestly
Which path to walk all gingerly
Some race, some trace
But wisdom is pace, and position.
For there you are
Facing the transition
Muttering opiatically
Whatever your vision
During life, your chance to get
Wierdly hard, clearly beset
Did you choose the nothiness
The opiate
Did you choose a vision when
The smarties called it prison,
But here on your bed
It’s easily and honestly said
I saw my vision and lived it proper
Despite recruitment by derided sophists,
They experienced some similar,
But could not connect it
Their prison may have been
Purely proved
My vision may have been
Thickly grooved,
But I chose light
And free flowing intermingling souls
So in this opiate haze
Death be not proud,
Because I chose it lifts death’s shroud
It let’s me into this
Vision I made
While you lay in a box
Unlike us crazies
Your in the dark, pushing up daiseies
The house stood strong year after year, generation after generation. One generation, marriage, kids, new generation, marriage kids. And the house stood strong and still. Until that ugly day when the next of the new generations moved in next door.
The beauty of Brooklyn remains that among the many possible Brooklyns, there is just one King Brooklyn. When King Brooklyn is disturbed it reacts with words, with fights, with conspiracy, with tragedy.
All was well in Brooklyn until that new generation stepped-in. They hadn’t kids yet, and followed in the footsteps of the previous generations. Here next door, the usual difficulties and plagues were at play, but it wasn’t until that next new generation showed up that King Brooklyn was disturbed. Violence anger an ugliness had entered the kingdom. Blame had taken the place of pressured compromise, name-calling had taken the place of the type of strained polite-greeting customary in close quarters.
It all started with the kind of lie that pleases all of the senses and gasses-up the mechanism that makes close quarter compromise possible. Easy-going and non-confrontational were the promises made and they struck home as that most quintessential of all King Brooklyn rules, live-and-let-live.
Then the moon sank, and as it prepared to sink again the new generation made its entrance. The girl led a quiet charge, ostensibly because that easy-going non-confrontational hyphenate was true to his billing. As she spoke the strained politeness turned to threat. Pressured compromise took hold as King Brooklyn exerted its worthy muscles and tragedy was averted, if only temporarily.
Then came mother’s day and here next door most of the family was out while grandmother was planting flowers and loving the two year-old who laughed and sniffed at her direction. Next door the ugliness was brewing. The brother introduced his third to make the dogs a pack. This new introduction was the ugliest thing yet, which says a great deal in the dog-heaven section of King Brooklyn.
Before the full-blown beginning was the close compromise curiosity necessary for safe-passage to the next moon sinking. And then the barking. The barking began increasing the strain part of curiosity. Then came the moment of truth, would the ugliness be compromised or would it live. The brother exited, looked-up to the two and sixty-eight and swore, and cursed, and threatened and made that living singled out from that “let-live” King Brooklyn demands. The countess of New England called out this ever decreasing slime of Brooklyn. “There is a child here” echoed sufficiently to call the bitch next door to call in the dog and the pack.
Upon the return here next door, the tale was laid bare to the shock and consternation of this first generation, and then came the realization that King Brooklyn’s rule to live-and-let-live was broken. As previously noted this was the dog-heaven section of Brooklyn so here next door was adequately represented. It was walk time and with leash attached the front door was opened, the representative was led out and down the stairs in hopes of passing the pack fenced in and circling on the other side of the fence. With a little effort the leashed representative was led down the stairs and onto the street level section called the front yard. Upon arriving the next door pack jutted noses through the fence and bit our representative. A pull back occurred on both sides, but then the dog began to yell. He yelled ugly and vile things, and as the broken rule had turned to this, this was met with less vile, but still ugly remarks.
After a few choice phrases the uselessness of yelling became apparent on this end and the walk began anew. Neighbors were shocked, but seemingly glad the walk continued as that dog kept yelling. It seemed part of the strained compromise required, even though followed only by half. Then came the queen and the prince from here next door. What is this, what is the yelling and similar questions were posed. Then the ugliness returned. If the ugly and vile opening were not enough, the ugliest and most vile were saved for the Queen. A particular brand of hate spewed from the dog’s mouth, a hate that impugned the Queen and a large number of King Brooklyn’s inhabitants. It then added the mouth-gaped seven year-old to the tirade and as the volume raised the walk was abrupted and the King reconfronted the dog.
All had taken to their quarters, it had ended.
Silent strain hovered over 11th Street. Some neighbors wanted to sign to help rid the dog. Some warned that distance was the preferred method. Then came the next of the exquisite days. An intergenerational group walked toward here next door, and stopped-in at the dog pack house. This King stared them down, an almost meaningless gesture until brother dog came out with similar ugly and vile commentary. This was met with a directive toward the older generation, “apologize!” The same craziness that allowed those most ugly and vile thoughts to meet the dog’s tongue in the first place now took hold again and were hurled over the fence. This hurling was coupled with violent gestured, violent language and threats of a type that start wars, and do nothing but up the ante until the opponents cannot afford to play any longer.
As the King’s knights in shiny blue amour heard the King’s tale the rule of King Brooklyn was morphed from live-and-let-live to live-and-die by the ugly dog as pride is more important than life. “Forget that most vile word, that is nothing, but when the mother was called a whore all bets were off.” Nothing to do with the child having heard this, nothing having to do with the child having head worse, the blue called the aged King to task for failing to meet the gladiator on the gladiator’s terms. Ah but that is why blue is blue and king is king, and why gladiators all die in the end.
Time passed as it had before, under the silent strain of close quarters. Here next door the King could not order the peace of the seven year old Prince, he had to grow it, slowly as he had done before. The king could not order his canine representative calm, but he insisted on standing tall, walking straight and fearing nothing. All complied.
It was time to walk again, so the leash was affixed, this next door opened and the exit an descent began. The circling dog pack was next door in front, as was that house’s dog, from the first and the third, not the second incident. He exit and the walk occurred and the re-entrance was at hand. The King bore the common plastic bag in hand with his representative leashed as he entered his kingdom and lifted the top to the can. “Drop.” In went the bag and the top was dropped back to its place.
As the falling top revealed what it hid, that third in the the pack, that ugly one had jumped the fence, landed on the falling top and leaped off attached its jaws to the beck on my representative. The King held firm and screamed for weapons while trying to unclench the unclenchable. The bitch from next door screamed and her dog attended to the unclenching. The dog caused the dog to bite the dog and when that unclenching occurred the dog tossed the dog back over the fence and it was over, for now.
Surgery, pain, fear, medication, annoyance, inconvenience, sadness took hold here next door. Yet still there was no apology from the dog. Instead the dog put up a sign lauding his dog as the real dog, and sinking the King’s representative as weak. And until the act resumes, the kike here next door sees the sign hanging as a tragedy on 11th St.
Sara Palin is getting at something, but because it is Sara Palin she cannot get to it. She may have been a victim of class warfare, Gov. Blago may also be a victim. It is not, however, because of the press, but because of the American people. You see, games are played by upper class people, different versions of the same games are played by middle class people and different still version of thos and new games are played by lower class people. So what is a class of people? Since we are not in India, this will have to be defined if we are to make sense of any of this.
Class has to do with the degree to which one is in the system. Not money – Joe Biden ain’t rich!, not family – just compare the Bush Family with the
Law School taught me a lot of obscure things that were meant to expand my mind, not to facilitate my practice. Oddly enough, DISGORGEMENT seems to have been one of those things if only because nobody uses it. And why doesn’t anybody use it, it seems lawful, fair and necessary. And if they do use it, why don’t we hear about it fulfilling one of the tenets of criminal law, deterrence.
I Googled the term for a standard definition and the first up was from www.investopedia.com – how apropos.
Disgorgement
What does it Mean?
A repayment of ill-gotten gains that is imposed on wrong-doers by the courts. Funds that were received through illegal or unethical business transactions are disgorged, or paid back, with interest to those affected by the action. Disgorgement is a remedial civil action, rather than a punitive civil action.
Investopedia Says…
Individuals or companies that violate Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulations are typically required to pay both civil money penalties and disgorgement. Civil money penalties are punitive, while disgorgement is about paying back profits made from those actions that violated the SEC’s regulations.
However, disgorgement payments are not only demanded of those who violate securities regulations. Anyone profiting from illegal or unethical activities may be civilly required to disgorge their profits.
What better policy than this? What better time than now? Are we a nation of laws or are we all out for ourselves?
Disgorge assets at the actual current value and turnaround this superstructure.
Barak Obama is betting
+ Himself and us
+ On the bet
+ We will
+ Support
+ Him
+ 4
+ Us
= ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES
Religion is adverse to
+ The inherent right of
+ The state to be
+ Civil and not
+ Religious,
+ Who-ah
= COUNTRY FIRST
I’m with Dems Bums
+ Democrats
+ As I am
+ Unsure
+ If it is free
+ Or fair
+ That rules the
+ Otherwise balanced nature
= THE THINGS I KNOW I DON’T KNOW
The difference between
+ Any Congressman
+ Is the confident
+ Direction of
+ Seniority
+ With
+ Wisdom
= LOW APPROVAL, BUT NIMBY
That’s 99¢
x On a dollar bill.
x Have your penny,
x Sir.
x *smirk* ,
= CHANGE
We are they who
+ We oust for
+ Proper purity
+ But we
+ Them ,
= WE/YOU
What you
/ Do and
/ What
/ You see
/ Be
/ It ,
= CAN
Tightly
Squeezing
Through to
A wider world
To .
= BELIEVE
We are you
® And you
® Are we
® So not super
® Official that
® It is all
® Us ,
= IN
BY SLOPPY SECONDS SLOGANEER
I just heard a rap pointing out Bill O’Reilley’s hypocrisy as justification for being hypocritical in the death penalty value. I wonder why someone with such intelligence would become their enemy in order to extinguish their enemy. Then I thought of America. We may not realize it, but we are to many the Bill O’Reilley of the world. As this election tide rises I think it valuable to emphasize what we have done and a forgotten point that will be important to your voting. We want to kill our enemy because we are human. That is on them. However, we have become them to eradicate them. We have tortured, politicized, wilded, stolen and polluted parts of the world that did not kill us, and in doing this our name has been on display as we are hypocritical. This is on us. At home we have eviscerated a swath of protection sought after by all, fought for by many, and died in the world over. the Great Writ, the right to counsel, courts and justice while betraying our warriors on the field and in the back-rooms. Why would we betray ourselves so fully? Because we chose, whether it be by vote or apathy, we have not sufficiently raizen. I urge my fellow voters to seize the change in the broadest spirit as that will make that future and necessary better at being itself. To we nay-sayers, it is time to rally on this side, on the left. I promise you this is your time to undertake that task as we have many good government types side-by-side with fiscal volume control. If you take this opportunity we will win and you will win. You will gain maximum influence for your effort if it rises to a good-faith recognition of the new path into the future. And shall we hold them to that threshold, yes people, accept their good-faith when it is that. If they do not get there it is on them. If we do not accept it is on us. I support Barak Obama because some things must be despite the pain of change because we owe more than we’ve obtained. Accept luck and turn it wholly toward ourselves, our world and what also must be.